Author:
Demidov German,Laurie Steven,Torella Annalaura,Piluso Giulio,Scala Marcello,Morleo Manuela,Nigro Vincenzo,Graessner Holm,Banka Siddharth,Lohmann Katja,Ossowski Stephan,
Abstract
AbstractStructural variants (SVs), including large deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations, and complex SVs have the potential to disrupt gene function resulting in rare disease. Nevertheless, current pipelines and clinical decision support systems for exome sequencing (ES) tend to focus on small alterations such as single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions-deletions shorter than 50 base pairs (indels). Additionally, detection and interpretation of large copy-number variants (CNVs) are frequently performed. However, detection of other types of SVs in ES data is hampered by the difficulty of identifying breakpoints in off-target (intergenic or intronic) regions, which makes robust identification of SVs challenging. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of SV calling in ES resulting in a diagnostic yield of 0.4% (23 out of 5,825 probands) for a large cohort of unsolved patients collected by the Solve-RD consortium. Remarkably, 8 out of 23 pathogenic SV were not found by comprehensive read-depth-based CNV analysis, resulting in a 0.13% increased diagnostic value.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory