Changes in emergency department utilization in vulnerable populations after COVID-19 shelter in place orders

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare emergency department (ED) utilization and admission rates for patients with a history of mental health (MH), substance use disorder (SUD) and social determinants of health (SDOH) before and after implementing COVID-19’s shelter-in-place (SIP) orders.MethodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter study leveraging electronic medical record data from 20 EDs across a large Midwest integrated healthcare system from 5/2/2019 to 12/31/2019 (pre-SIP) and from 5/2/2020 to 12/31/2020 (post-SIP). Diagnoses were documented in the patient’s medical records. Poisson and logistic regression models were used to evaluate ED utilization and admission rate changes.Results871,020 total ED encounters from 487,028 unique patients were captured. 2,572 (0.53%) patients had a documented Z code for SDOH. Patients with previously diagnosed MH or SUDs were more likely to seek ED care after the SIP orders were implemented (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18 – 1.22, p<0.001), as were patients with SDOH (RR: 2.37, 95% CI: 2.19 – 2.55, p<0.001). Patients with both previously diagnosed MH or SUD and a documented SDOH had even higher ED utilization (RR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.83 – 3.88, p<0.001) than those with either condition alone. Patients with MH and SUDs (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86 – 0.92, p<0.001) or SDOH (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.83, p<0.001) were less likely to be admitted post-SIP orders while patients with a history of diseases of physiologic systems were more likely to be admitted.ConclusionsVulnerable populations with a history of MH, SUD, and SDOH experienced increased ED utilization but a lower rate of hospital admissions after the implementation of SIP orders. The findings highlight the importance of addressing these needs to mitigate the impact of public health crises on these populations.