Scenario Design for Infectious Disease Projections: Integrating Concepts from Decision Analysis and Experimental Design

Author:

Runge Michael C.ORCID,Shea KatrionaORCID,Howerton EmilyORCID,Yan KatieORCID,Hochheiser HarryORCID,Rosenstrom ErikORCID,Probert William J.M.ORCID,Borchering RebeccaORCID,Marathe Madhav V.ORCID,Lewis BryanORCID,Venkatramanan SrinivasanORCID,Truelove ShaunORCID,Lessler JustinORCID,Viboud CécileORCID

Abstract

AbstractAcross many fields, scenario modeling has become an important tool for exploring long-term projections and how they might depend on potential interventions and critical uncertainties, with relevance to both decision makers and scientists. In the past decade, and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, the field of epidemiology has seen substantial growth in the use of scenario projections. Multiple scenarios are often projected at the same time, allowing important comparisons that can guide the choice of intervention, the prioritization of research topics, or public communication. The design of the scenarios is central to their ability to inform important questions. In this paper, we draw on the fields of decision analysis and statistical design of experiments to propose a framework for scenario design in epidemiology, with relevance also to other fields. We identify six different fundamental purposes for scenario designs (decision making, sensitivity analysis, value of information, situational awareness, horizon scanning, and forecasting) and discuss how those purposes guide the structure of scenarios. We discuss other aspects of the content and process of scenario design, broadly for all settings and specifically for multi-model ensemble projections. As an illustrative case study, we examine the first 17 rounds of scenarios from the U.S. COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub, then reflect on future advancements that could improve the design of scenarios in epidemiological settings.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference86 articles.

1. A review of scenario planning

2. Land use-transportation scenario planning: promise and reality

3. Barrett, C. , Eubank, S. , Marathe, A. , Marathe, M. , Swarup, S ., 2015. Synthetic information environments for policy informatics: a distributed cognition perspective, in: Johnston, E.W . (Ed.), Governance in the Information Era: Theory and Practice of Policy Informatics. Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 267–284.

4. Bay, C. , St-Onge, G. , Davis, J.T. , Chinazzi, M. , Howerton, E. , Lessler, J. , Runge, M.C. , Shea, K. , Truelove, S. , Viboud, C. , Vespigiani, A. , in review. Ensemble2: scenarios ensembling for communication and performance analysis. Epidemics.

5. Beauchamp, T.L. , Childress, J.F. , 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. Oxford University Press New York, New York. ISBN 9780195335705.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3