Abstract
AbstractChannel interference in mass cytometry can cause spillover and may result in miscounting of protein markers. Chevrieret al. (2018) introduce an experimental and computational procedure to estimate and compensate for spillover implemented in their R packageCATALYST. They assume spillover can be described by a spillover matrix that encodes the ratio between unstained and stained channels. They estimate the spillover matrix from experiments with beads. We propose to skip the matrix estimation step and work directly with the full bead distributions. We develop a nonparametric finite mixture model, and use the mixture components to estimate the probability of spillover. Spillover correction is often a pre-processing step followed by downstream analyses, choosing a flexible model reduces the chance of introducing biases that can propagate downstream. We implement our method in an R packagespillRusing expectation-maximization to fit the mixture model. We test our method on synthetic and real data fromCATALYST. We find that our method compensates low counts accurately, does not introduce negative counts, avoids overcompensating high counts, and preserves correlations between markers that may be biologically meaningful.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory