Vibration of effects resulting from network geometry in mixed-treatment comparisons: a case study on network meta-analyses of antidepressants in major depressive disorder

Author:

Vinatier ConstantORCID,Palpacuer ClementORCID,Scanff AlexandreORCID,Naudet FlorianORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIt is frequent to find overlapping network meta-analyses (NMAs) on the same topic with differences in terms of both treatments included and effect estimates. We aimed to evaluate the impact on effect estimates of selecting different treatment combinations (i.e. network geometries) for inclusion in NMAs.DesignMultiverse analysis, covering all possible NMAs on different combinations of treatments.SettingData from a previously published NMA exploring the comparative effectiveness of 22 treatments (21 antidepressants and a placebo) for the treatment of acute major depressive disorder.ParticipantsCipriani et al (2018) explored a dataset of 116 477 patients included in 522 randomized controlled trials.Main outcome measuresFor each possible network geometry, we performed a NMA to estimate comparative effectiveness on treatment response and treatment discontinuation for the treatments included (231 between-treatment comparisons). The distribution of effect estimates of between-treatment comparisons across NMAs was computed, and the direction, magnitude, and statistical significance of the 1stand 99thpercentiles were compared.Results4 116 254 different NMAs concerned treatment response. Among possible network geometries, 172/ 231 (74%) pairwise comparisons exhibited opposite effects between the 1stand 99thpercentiles, 57/231 (25%) comparisons exhibited statistically significant results in opposite directions, 118 of 231 (51%) comparisons derived non-robust results in terms of statistical significance at 5% risk and 56/231 (24%) treatment pairs obtained robust results across meta-analyses. Comparisons based on indirect evidence only were associated with greater variability in effect estimates. Comparisons with small absolute values observed in the complete NMA more frequently obtained statistically significant results in opposite directions. Similar results were observed for treatment discontinuation.ConclusionIn this case study we observed that the selection of treatments to be included in a NMA could have considerable consequences on treatment effect estimations.Registrationhttps://osf.io/mb5dy

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3