Research participants’ perception of ethical issues in stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research in Africa

Author:

Jegede Ayodele,Balogun Olubukola,Olorunsogbon Olorunyomi FelixORCID,Nichols Michelle,Akinyemi Joshua,Jenkins Carolyn,Ogunronbi Mayowa,Singh Arti,Obiako ReginaldORCID,Wahab Kolawole,Bello Abiodun,Akpalu AlbertORCID,Sarfo Fred S.,Owolabi Lukman F.,Ojebuyi BabatundeORCID,Adigun Muyiwa,Olujobi DorcasORCID,Musbahu Rabiu,Titiloye Musibau,Afolami Ibukun,Calys-Tagoe Benedict,Uvere EzinneORCID,Laryea Ruth,Fakunle Adekunle,Adeleye OsiORCID,Adesina Deborah,Mensah Nathaniel,Oguike Wisdom,Coleman Nathaniel,Adeniyi Sunday,Omotoso Lanre,Asibey Shadrack,Melikam Lois,Yusuf Jibril,Gbenga Abdullateef,Mande Aliyu,Uthman Muhammed,Kalaria Rajesh N.,Owolabi Mayowa,Ovbiagele Bruce,Arulogun OyedunniORCID,Akinyemi Rufus O.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is a growing interest in stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research in Africa. These raise several ethical issues, such as consent, re-use, data sharing, storage, and incidental result of biological samples. Despite the availability of ethical guidelines developed for research in Africa, there is paucity of information on how the research participants’ perspectives could guide the research community on ethical issues in stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research. To explore African research participants’ perspectives on these issues, a study was conducted at existing Stroke Investigation Research and Education Network (SIREN) sites in Nigeria and Ghana.MethodUsing an exploratory design, twenty-eight Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) sessions were conducted with stroke survivors (n=7), caregivers(n=7), stroke - free controls(n=7), and Community Advisory Board members(n=7). Data were collected using an interview guide. Interviews were conducted in English and indigenous languages of the community, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using NVivo (March, 2020) Software.ResultResults revealed that stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research in Africa require researchers’ direct attention to ethical issues. Concerns were raised about understanding, disclosure and absence of coercion as components of true autonomous decision making in research participation. Participants argued that the risk and benefits attached to participation should be disclosed at the time of recruitment. Fears around data sharing were voiced as adherence to the principle of privacy and confidentiality were of paramount importance to participants. The preference was to receive the results of incidental findings with no stigma attached from society.ConclusionResearch participants’ perspectives are a vital aspect of community engagement in stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research. Findings from this study suggest that research participants are interested in these fields of research in Africa if their concerns about ethical issues are appropriately addressed within the research framework.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. H3Africa: current perspectives;Pharmgenomics Pers Med,2018

2. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa

3. H3Africa Ethics Working Group. Ethics and governance framework for best practice in genomic research and biobanking in Africa. 2018.

4. Akinyemi RO , Jenkins C , Nichols M , Singh A , Wahab K , Akpalu A , et al. Unraveling the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Neurobiobanking and Stroke Genomic Research in Africa: A Study Protocol of the African Neurobiobank for Precision Stroke Medicine ELSI Project. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19.

5. Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries;BMC medical ethics,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3