Preterm formula, fortified or unfortified human milk for very preterm infants, the PREMFOOD study, a parallel randomised feasibility trial

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveUncertainty exists regarding optimal supplemental diet for very preterm infants if mother’s own milk (MM) is insufficient. We evaluated feasibility for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) powered to detect important differences in health outcomes.MethodsIn this open, parallel, feasibility trial, we randomised infants 25+0-31+6 weeks gestation by opt-out consent, to one of three diets: unfortified human milk (UHM) (unfortified MM and/or unfortified pasteurised human donor milk (DM) supplement; fortified human milk (FHM) (fortified MM and/or fortified DM supplement), and unfortified MM and/or preterm formula (PTF) supplement from birth to 35+0 weeks post menstrual age. Feasibility outcomes included opt-outs, adherence rates, and slow growth safety criteria. We also obtained anthropometry, and magnetic resonance imaging body composition data at term and term plus 6 weeks (opt-in consent).Results35 infants were randomised to UHM, 34 to FHM, and 34 to PTF groups, of which 21, 19, and 24 infants completed imaging at term. Study entry opt-out rate was only 38%, while 6% of parents subsequently withdrew from feeding intervention. Two infants met predefined slow weight gain thresholds. There were no significant between-group differences in total adipose tissue volume at term (mean (sd): UHM: 0.870L (0.35L); FHM: 0.889L (0.31L); PTF: 0.809L (0.25L), p=0.66), nor in any other body composition measure or anthropometry at either timepoint.ConclusionsRandomisation to UHM, FHM, and PTF feeding interventions by opt-out consent was acceptable to parents and clinical teams, associated with safe growth profiles and no significant differences in body composition. Our data provide justification to proceed to a larger RCT.