Author:
Zhong Shan,Pouratian Nader,Christopoulos Vassilios
Abstract
AbstractSurviving in a constantly changing environment requires not only the ability to select actions, but also the flexibility to stop and switch actions when necessary. Extensive research has been devoted to understanding how the brain switches actions, yet the computations underlying switching and how it relates to selecting and stopping processes remain elusive. A central question is whether switching is an extension of the stopping process or involves different mechanisms. To address this question, we modeled action regulation tasks with a neurocomputational theory and evaluated its predictions on individuals performing reaches in a dynamic environment. Our findings suggest that, unlike stopping, switching does not necessitate a proactive pause mechanism to delay movement onset. However, switching engages a pause mechanism after movement onset, if the new target location is unknown prior to switch signal. These findings offer a new understanding of the action-switching computations, opening new avenues for future neurophysiological investigations.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference38 articles.
1. How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking;Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance,2008
2. Dynamics of saccade target selection: Race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque
3. Schall JD , Palmeri TJ , and Logan GD . Models of inhibitory control. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B , Biological sciences, 372, 2017.
4. Verbruggen F , Aron AR , Band GP , Beste C , Bissett PG , and Brockett AT et al. A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. Elife, 8, 2019.
5. On the globality of motor suppression: unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition;Neuron,2017