Abstract
AbstractThe analysis of extensive electronic health records (EHR) datasets often calls for automated solutions, with machine learning (ML) techniques, including deep learning (DL), taking a lead role. One common task involves categorizing EHR data into predefined groups. However, the vulnerability of EHRs to noise and errors stemming from data collection processes, as well as potential human labeling errors, poses a significant risk. This risk is particularly prominent during the training of DL models, where the possibility of overfitting to noisy labels can have serious repercussions in healthcare. Despite the well-documented existence of label noise in EHR data, few studies have tackled this challenge within the EHR domain. Our work addresses this gap by adapting computer vision (CV) algorithms to mitigate the impact of label noise in DL models trained on EHR data. Notably, it remains uncertain whether CV methods, when applied to the EHR domain, will prove effective, given the substantial divergence between the two domains. We present empirical evidence demonstrating that these methods, whether used individually or in combination, can substantially enhance model performance when applied to EHR data, especially in the presence of noisy/incorrect labels. We validate our methods and underscore their practical utility in real-world EHR data, specifically in the context of COVID-19 diagnosis. Our study highlights the effectiveness of CV methods in the EHR domain, making a valuable contribution to the advancement of healthcare analytics and research.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference58 articles.
1. Molecular diagnostic technologies for COVID-19: Limitations and challenges;Journal of advanced research,2020
2. Frequency and types of patient-reported errors in electronic health record ambulatory care notes;JAMA network open,2020
3. Ben-Gal, I. (2005). Outlier detection. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, 131–146.
4. Bowman, S. (2013). Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. Perspectives in health information management, 10(Fall).
5. Blum, A. , & Mitchell, T. (1998, July). Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory (pp. 92–100).