Evidence on the use of Birthrate Plus® to guide safe staffing in maternity services – a systematic scoping review

Author:

Griffiths PeterORCID,Turner LesleyORCID,Lown Jenny,Sanders JuliaORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBirthrate Plus® is a widely used tool that informs decisions about the number of midwifery staff needed to provide safe and high quality care in maternity services.Evidence about the effectiveness, validity, reliability, and feasibility of tools such as this is needed.ObjectiveTo identify, describe and analyse the available evidence supporting the use of Birthrate Plus.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, Academic Search, British Library Ethos, Directory of Open Access Journals and Science Direct. Studies were eligible if they reported empirical data relevant to the validity, reliability, or useability of Birthrate Plus or if they measured the impact on staffing levels, outcomes, costs or provided a comparison with other methods.Results23 sources of evidence were identified and reviewed. We found no prospective intervention studies on the use of Birthrate Plus to demonstrate outcomes for mothers, babies or staff wellbeing. Nor did we find studies comparing the tool to other methods or addressing resource use. Most of the evidence was descriptive, focussing on the use of the tool or the results of Birthrate Plus assessments. There is some evidence of the reliability of application of categories within the tool, the ability of the tool to detect variation in demand and to highlight staff shortages.ConclusionsIn terms of traditional hierarchies of evidence, the evidence for Birthrate Plus is weak. There is a need for more independent research or simulation using real world data to understand how the tool performs in the current context of midwifery practice.Statement of significanceProblem or IssueIt is important to ensure that there are sufficient midwives to provide safe and effective care and support positive experiences for women during pregnancy and child birth.What is Already KnownBirthrate Plus is a widely used tool to calculate staffing requirements, which is promoted by the company as being ‘evidence based’.What this Paper AddsThis review of evidence found major gaps. There is no direct evidence that Birthrate Plus calculates the correct level of staffing or performs better than other systems or professional judgement alone.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference48 articles.

1. Ball JA , Washbrook M. Birthrate plus: a famework for workforce planning and decision making for midwifery services: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1996.

2. Zhou N , Lu H , Zhao HM , Li FJ , Yang MH . Midwifery service and midwifery human resource demand in western China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2019;394(Suppl. 34).

3. Work and workload of Dutch primary care midwives in 2010;Midwifery,2014

4. Birthrate Plus. Birthrate Plus® abroad 2023 [Available from: https://birthrateplus.co.uk/birthrate-plus-abroad/.

5. Midwifery and nurse staffing of inpatient maternity services–a systematic scoping review of associations with outcomes and quality of care;Midwifery,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3