Abstract
AbstractBackgroundBirthrate Plus® is a widely used tool that informs decisions about the number of midwifery staff needed to provide safe and high quality care in maternity services.Evidence about the effectiveness, validity, reliability, and feasibility of tools such as this is needed.ObjectiveTo identify, describe and analyse the available evidence supporting the use of Birthrate Plus.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, Academic Search, British Library Ethos, Directory of Open Access Journals and Science Direct. Studies were eligible if they reported empirical data relevant to the validity, reliability, or useability of Birthrate Plus or if they measured the impact on staffing levels, outcomes, costs or provided a comparison with other methods.Results23 sources of evidence were identified and reviewed. We found no prospective intervention studies on the use of Birthrate Plus to demonstrate outcomes for mothers, babies or staff wellbeing. Nor did we find studies comparing the tool to other methods or addressing resource use. Most of the evidence was descriptive, focussing on the use of the tool or the results of Birthrate Plus assessments. There is some evidence of the reliability of application of categories within the tool, the ability of the tool to detect variation in demand and to highlight staff shortages.ConclusionsIn terms of traditional hierarchies of evidence, the evidence for Birthrate Plus is weak. There is a need for more independent research or simulation using real world data to understand how the tool performs in the current context of midwifery practice.Statement of significanceProblem or IssueIt is important to ensure that there are sufficient midwives to provide safe and effective care and support positive experiences for women during pregnancy and child birth.What is Already KnownBirthrate Plus is a widely used tool to calculate staffing requirements, which is promoted by the company as being ‘evidence based’.What this Paper AddsThis review of evidence found major gaps. There is no direct evidence that Birthrate Plus calculates the correct level of staffing or performs better than other systems or professional judgement alone.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference48 articles.
1. Ball JA , Washbrook M. Birthrate plus: a famework for workforce planning and decision making for midwifery services: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1996.
2. Zhou N , Lu H , Zhao HM , Li FJ , Yang MH . Midwifery service and midwifery human resource demand in western China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2019;394(Suppl. 34).
3. Work and workload of Dutch primary care midwives in 2010;Midwifery,2014
4. Birthrate Plus. Birthrate Plus® abroad 2023 [Available from: https://birthrateplus.co.uk/birthrate-plus-abroad/.
5. Midwifery and nurse staffing of inpatient maternity services–a systematic scoping review of associations with outcomes and quality of care;Midwifery,2021