Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAlthough cardiac ultrasound is frequently performed in patients with chest pain, the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) cannot be quantified. We investigated the potential of cardiac ultrasound radiomics (ultrasomics) to identify obstructive CAD using limited echocardiography frames, suitable for cardiac point-of-care ultrasound evaluation.MethodsIn total, 333 patients who were either healthy controls (n=30), undergoing invasive coronary procedures (n=113), or coronary CT angiography (n=190) were divided into two temporally distinct training (n=271) and testing (n=62) cohorts. Machine learning models were developed using ultrasomics for predicting severe CAD (stenosis >70%) and compared with regional LV wall motion abnormalities (RWMA).ResultsIn total, 94 (28.2%) patients had severe CAD with 50 (15.0%) having high-risk CAD defined as left main stenosis >50% (n=11), multivessel CAD (n=43), or 100% occlusion (n=20). The ultrasomics model was superior to RWMA for predicting severe CAD [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 0.86) vs. 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72), p=0.0014] in the training set and [0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) vs. 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.81), p=0.24] in the test set, respectively. The model also predicted high-risk CAD with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90) in the training set and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48-0.88) in the test set. A combination of ultrasomics with RWMA showed incremental value over RWMA alone for predicting severe CAD.ConclusionsCardiac ultrasomic features extracted from limited echocardiography views can aid the development of machine learning models to predict the presence of severe obstructive CAD.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference29 articles.
1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
2. Epidemiology and the magnitude of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome: a narrative review;Journal of epidemiology and global health,2021
3. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain
4. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Angiography: Executive Summary and Recommendations
5. CAD-RADS™ 2.0–2022 coronary artery disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American college of radiology (ACR), and the North America society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI);Cardiovascular Imaging,2022