The costs and cost-effectiveness of different service models of palliative care, focusing on end of life care: A rapid review

Author:

Spencer Llinos HafORCID,Anthony Bethany Fern,Davies Jacob,Pisavadia KalpaORCID,Gillen Liz,Noyes Jayne,Fitzsimmons Deborah,Lewis Ruth,Cooper Alison,Hughes Dyfrig,Edwards Rhiannon Tudor,Edwards Adrian

Abstract

AbstractSome people receive palliative or end of life care at home, others in hospitals or hospices, or a combination of home and hospice/home and hospital models. This rapid review aims to determine the costs and cost-effectiveness of different service models of palliative care or end of life care. These studies are mostly conducted from the perspective of the healthcare system, disregarding costs related to patients/caregivers economic burden (Perea-Bello et al., 2023).Research Implications and Evidence GapsMore UK research is needed on cost impacts of new services such as Enhanced Supported Care (ESC). Future research should consider which methods are most appropriate to evaluate palliative care models. Standard methodology, such as the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), may not be most appropriate for this end of life population.Improving QALYs may not be the intended aim of palliative care or end of life interventions, and prolonging death may be inconsistent with patient preferences and wishes. The quality and applicability of the evidence we found in our rapid review were variable, and therefore, uncertainty remains, especially when the perspective of analysis was not stated clearly.Therefore, it was difficult to ascertain whether all relevant costs were considered. Assumptions on costs were not varied in many studies, and most studies had different time horizons.Policy and Practice ImplicationsThis rapid review has shown thathospital-based palliative care costs are higher than hospice or home-basedpalliative care. This suggests thathome-based palliative care should be available to allpatients in a recognisable end of life phase who desire to remain and die at home. Healthcare planners shouldaim to reduce hospitalisation at the end of lifebutonly if access to quality home careat the end of life is guaranteed.Patients should have a choiceabout where they prefer to die without moving the costs from the healthcare system to the home caregivers, rendering the costs invisible.Funding StatementThe Bangor Institute for Medical and Health Research, was funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hospice care and the value of a statistical life year (VSLY);BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care;2024-05-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3