Validating layer-specific VASO across species

Author:

Huber Laurentius RenzoORCID,Poser Benedikt AORCID,Kaas Amanda LORCID,Fear Elizabeth J,Desbach Sebastian,Berwick JasonORCID,Goebel RainerORCID,Turner RobertORCID,Kennerley Aneurin JORCID

Abstract

AbstractCerebral blood volume (CBV) has been shown to be a robust and important physiological parameter for quantitative interpretation of functional (f)MRI, capable of delivering highly localized mapping of neural activity. Indeed, with recent advances in ultra-high-field (>=7T) MRI hardware and associated sequence libraries, it has become possible to capture non-invasive CBV weighted fMRI signals across cortical layers. One of the most widely used approaches to achieve this (in humans) is through vascular-space-occupancy (VASO) fMRI. Unfortunately, the exact contrast mechanisms of layer-dependent VASO fMRI have not been validated and thus interpretation of such data is confounded. Here we cross-validate layer-dependent VASO fMRI contrast in a preclinical rat model using well established (but invasive) imaging methods in response to neuronal activation (somatosensory cortex) and respiratory challenge (hypercapnia). In particular VASO derived CBV measures are directly compared to concurrent measures of total haemoglobin changes from high resolution intrinsic optical imaging spectroscopy (OIS). Through direct comparison of response magnitude, across time, negligible changes in hematocrit ratio during activation (neuronal or vascular) are inferred. Quantified cortical layer profiling is demonstrated and in agreement between both VASO and contrast enhanced fMRI (using monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles, MION). Responses show high spatial localisation to layers of cortical excitatory and inhibitory processing independent of confounding large draining veins which hamper BOLD fMRI studies. While we find increased VASO based CBV reactivity (3.1 ± 1.2 fold increase) in humans compared to rats it is demonstrated that this reflects differences in stimulus design rather than confounds of the VASO signal source. Together, our findings confirm that the VASO contrast is indeed a reliable estimate of layer-specific CBV changes. This validation study increases the neuronal interpretability of human layer-dependent fMRI results and should supersede BOLD fMRI as the method of choice in neuroscience application studies.HighlightsOur goal is to validate layer-specific VASO fMRI with gold standard methodsLayer-specific VASO sequences are implemented for 7T imaging in humans and ratsComparisons of VASO, optical imaging, and MION confirm the expected contrast originSomatosensory stimulation in humans and rats reveal the same layer-fMRI signaturesWe confirm that VASO is a valid measure to estimate layer-specific neural activityGraphical abstract

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference137 articles.

1. Arkley, K. (2014). Rats use their whiskers in a similar way to how humans use their hands and fingers. ScienceDaily, (July).

2. Strategy Change in Vibrissal Active Sensing during Rat Locomotion

3. Imaging laminar structures in the gray matter with diffusion MRI;NeuroImage,2019

4. The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals

5. Beckett, A. J. , Dadakova, T. , Townsend, J. , Huber, L. , Park, S. , and Feinberg, D. A. (2020). Comparison of BOLD and CBV using 3D EPI and 3D GRASE for cortical layer fMRI at 7T. MRM, pages 1–18.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3