Comparative Effectiveness Study of Home-Based Interventions to Prevent CA-MRSA Infection Recurrence

Author:

Tobin Jonathan N.,Hower Suzanne,D’Orazio Brianna M.,de la Gándara María Pardos,Evering Teresa H.,Khalida Chamanara,Kost Rhonda G.,Vasquez Kimberly S.,de Lencastre Hermínia,Tomasz Alexander,Coller Barry S.,Vaughan Roger

Abstract

BACKGROUNDRecurrent skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant (CA-MRSA) or Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MSSA) present treatment challenges.OBJECTIVESCan an evidence-based intervention (CDC Guidelines, topical decolonization, surface decontamination) reduce SSTI recurrence, mitigate household contamination and transmission, and improve patient-reported outcomes?DESIGNRandomized trialSETTINGCommunity settingsPARTICIPANTSParticipants (n=186) with confirmed MRSA(+)/MSSA(+) SSTIs and household members.INTERVENTION Community Health Workers/Promotoras conducted home visits and provided participants with instructions, a five-day supply of mupirocin for nasal application, chlorhexidine for body cleansing, and disinfecting wipes for household cleaning (EXP) versus Usual Care (UC).MEASUREMENTSPrimary outcome was six-month SSTI recurrence recorded in electronic health records (EHR). Home visits (months 0/3) and telephone assessments (months 0/1/6) collected self-report data. Surveillance culture swabs (nares, axilla, groin) were obtained from index patients and participating household members. Secondary outcomes included household surface contamination, household member colonization and transmission, quality of life and satisfaction with care.RESULTSAmong patients with SSTIs (n=421), 44.2% were MRSA(+)/MSSA(+); an intent-to-treat analyses (n=186) demonstrated no significant differences in SSTI recurrence (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.51-3.5). Among the enrolled cohort (n=119), there were no significant SSTI recurrence effects (OR=1.14, 95% CI=0.35-3.6). EXP participants showed reduced but non-significant colonization rates. There were no differential reductions in household member transmission or in reductions in proportions of households with ≥1 contaminated surface. Mupirocin resistance did not increase. No significant improvements for patient-reported outcomes were seen.LIMITATIONSA lower-than-predicted six-month recurrence rate may have limited the ability to detect effects.CONCLUSIONThis intervention did not reduce clinician-reported MRSA/MSSA SSTI recurrence. No differences were observed for household members decolonization or household surfaces decontamination.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3