Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAccurate seroprevalence estimates of SARS-CoV-2 in different populations could clarify the extent to which current testing strategies are identifying all active infection, and hence the true magnitude and spread of the infection. Our primary objective was to identify valid seroprevalence studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and compare their estimates with the reported, and imputed, COVID-19 case rates within the same population at the same time point.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane COVID-19 trials, and Europe-PMC for published studies and pre-prints that reported anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgM and/or IgA antibodies for serosurveys of the general community from 1 Jan to 12 Aug 2020.ResultsOf the 2199 studies identified, 170 were assessed for full text and 17 studies representing 15 regions and 118,297 subjects were includable. The seroprevalence proportions in 8 studies ranged between 1%-10%, with 5 studies under 1%, and 4 over 10% - from the notably hard-hit regions of Gangelt, Germany; Northwest Iran; Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Stockholm, Sweden. For seropositive cases who were not previously identified as COVID-19 cases, the majority had prior COVID-like symptoms. The estimated seroprevalences ranged from 0.56-717 times greater than the number of reported cumulative cases – half of the studies reported greater than 10 times more SARS-CoV-2 infections than the cumulative number of cases.ConclusionsThe findings show SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is well below “herd immunity” in all countries studied. The estimated number of infections, however, were much greater than the number of reported cases and deaths in almost all locations. The majority of seropositive people reported prior COVID-like symptoms, suggesting that undertesting of symptomatic people may be causing a substantial under-ascertainment of SARS-CoV-2 infections.Key messagesSystematic assessment of 17-country data show SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is mostly less than 10% - levels well below “herd immunity”.High symptom rates in seropositive cases suggest undertesting of symptomatic people and could explain gaps between seroprevalence rates and reported cases.The estimated number of infections for majority of the studies ranged from 2-717 times greater than the number of reported cases in that region and up to 13 times greater than the cases imputed from number of reported deaths.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference44 articles.
1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard 2020 [Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
2. Wu J , Liu J , Li S , Peng Z , Xiao Z , Wang X , et al. Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2020:101673.
3. Prevention. CfDCa. Commercial Laboratory Seroprevalence Survey Data 2020 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/commercial-lab-surveys.html.
4. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2;Emerging Infectious Disease journal,2020
5. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19;Nat Med,2020