Incorporating genome-based phylogeny and functional similarity into diversity assessments helps to resolve a global collection of human gut metagenomes

Abstract

AbstractTree-based diversity measures incorporate phylogenetic or functional relatedness into comparisons of microbial communities. This can improve the identification of explanatory factors compared to tree-agnostic diversity measures. However, applying tree-based diversity measures to metagenome data is more challenging than for single-locus sequencing (e.g., 16S rRNA gene). The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) provides a genome-based reference database that can be used for species-level metagenome profiling, and a multi-locus phylogeny of all genomes that can be employed for diversity calculations. This approach also allows for functional diversity measures based on genomic content or traits inferred from it. Still, it is unclear how metagenome-based assessments of microbiome diversity benefit from incorporating phylogeny or function into measures of diversity. We assessed this by measuring phylogeny-based, function-based, and tree-agnostic diversity measures from a large, global collection of human gut metagenomes composed of 33 studies and 3348 samples. We found tree-based measures to explain phenotypic variation (e.g., westernization, disease status, and gender) better or on par with tree-agnostic measures. Ecophylogenetic and functional diversity measures provided unique insight into how microbiome diversity was partitioned by phenotype. Tree-based measures greatly improved machine learning model performance for predicting westernization, disease status, and gender, relative to models trained solely on tree-agnostic measures. Notably, ecophylogenetic and functional diversity measures were generally the most important features for predictive performance. Our findings illustrate the usefulness of tree- and function-based measures for metagenomic assessments of microbial diversity – a fundamental component of microbiome science.ImportanceEstimations of microbiome diversity are fundamental to understanding spatiotemporal changes of microbial communities and identifying which factors mediate such changes. Tree-based measures of diversity, which consider species relatedness, are widespread for amplicon-based microbiome studies due to their utility relative to tree-agnostic measures. However, tree-based measures are seldomly applied to shotgun metagenomics data. We evaluated the utility of phylogeny, functional relatedness, and tree-agnostic diversity measures on a large scale human gut metagenome dataset to help guide researchers with the complex task of evaluating microbiome diversity via metagenomics.