Abstract
AbstractIn hermaphroditic species, sexual interference can drive the evolution of dichogamy, where sporophylls (reproductive parts) are separated in time. However, the separation of sporophylls can lead to pollination inaccuracy, especially in movement-assisted dichogamy, where sporophylls alter their position over time. Is pollination inaccuracy minimised by the second sporophyll taking the exact position of the first? Are the sporophylls optimally positioned and stable in their respective active phases? We address these questions in Clerodendrum infortunatum, a protandrous, movement-assisted dichogamous species. We made predictions from optimality arguments, and tested these by measuring sporophyll angles over time, by experimentally manipulating flowers, and by estimating correlates of the resultant fitness, taking into account pollen export, pollination inaccuracy and the resultant total pollen delivered. Contrary to expectation, anthers do not have a fixed position in the male phase, and pollination inaccuracy is high. Further, when pollen load is highest, anthers are paradoxically not positioned at the pollen export peak. Also, pollen export and pollination accuracy peaks do not align. This seeming maladaptiveness of anther positioning nevertheless results in highest overall male fitness, measured as the total pollen delivered over the entire male phase. Instead of a simple positional exchange of sporophylls, stamens display a more complicated dynamic strategy which appears close to optimal even though naive measures of pollination inaccuracy are high. Such a strategy of maximising overall male fitness, integrating over the dynamics of stamen trajectory, could well be a general characteristic of protandrous movement-assisted dichogamy.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference52 articles.
1. Understanding plant reproductive diversity
2. de Jong, T. & Klinkhamer, P. Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
3. Bazzaz, F. A. & Grace, J. Plant resource allocation. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1997).
4. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants
5. INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES