Author:
Gehrung Marcel,Crispin-Ortuzar Mireia,Berman Adam G.,O’Donovan Maria,Fitzgerald Rebecca C.,Markowetz Florian
Abstract
AbstractDeep learning methods have been shown to achieve excellent performance on diagnostic tasks, but it is still an open challenge how to optimally combine them with expert knowledge and existing clinical decision pathways. This question is particularly important for the early detection of cancer, where high volume workflows might potentially benefit substantially from automated analysis. Here, we present a deep learning framework to analyse samples of the Cytosponge®-TFF3 test, a minimally invasive alternative to endoscopy, for detecting Barrett’s Esophagus, the main precursor of esophageal cancer. We trained and independently validated the framework on data from two clinical trials, analysing a combined total of 4,662 pathology slides from 2,331 patients. Our approach exploits screening patterns of expert gastrointestinal pathologists and established decision pathways to define eight triage classes of varying priority for manual expert review. By substituting manual review with automated review in low-priority classes, we can reduce pathologist workload by up to 66% while matching the diagnostic performance of expert pathologists. These results lay the foundation for tailored, semi-automated decision support systems embedded in clinical workflows.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference42 articles.
1. Hawkes, N. Cancer survival data emphasise importance of early diagnosis (2019).
2. Early detection of cancer: past, present, and future;American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book,2015
3. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow-up of Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities
4. CyR, P. R. Atypical moles. American family physician 78 (2008).
5. Talbot, I. , Price, A. & Salto-Tellez, M. Biopsy pathology in colorectal disease (CRC Press, 2006).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献