General environmental heterogeneity as the explanation of sexuality? Comparative study shows that ancient asexual taxa are associated with both biotically and abiotically homogeneous environments

Abstract

AbstractEcological theories of sexual reproduction assume that sexuality is advantageous in certain conditions, for example, in biotically or abiotically more heterogeneous environments. Such theories thus could be tested by comparative studies. However, the published results of these studies are rather unconvincing. Here we present the results of a new comparative study based solely on the ancient asexual clades. The association with biotically or abiotically homogeneous environments in these asexual clades was compared with the same association in their sister, or closely related, sexual clades. Using the conservative definition of ancient asexuals (i.e. age > 1 million years), we found six pairs for which relevant ecological data are available. The difference between the homogeneity type of environment associated with the sexual and asexual species was then compared in an exact binomial test. Based on available literature, the results showed that the vast majority of ancient asexual clades tend to be associated with biotically or abiotically, biotically, and abiotically more homogeneous environments than their sexual controls. In the exploratory part of the study, we found that the ancient asexuals often have durable resting stages, enabling life in subjectively homogeneous environments, live in the absence of intense biotic interactions, and are very often sedentary, inhabiting benthos and soil. The consequences of these findings for the ecological theories of sexual reproduction are discussed.