Physiological Differences Between Advanced Crossfit Athletes, Recreational Crossfit Participants, and Physically-Active Adults

Author:

Mangine Gerald T.ORCID,Stratton Matthew T.,Almeda Christian G.,Roberts Michael D.,Esmat Tiffany A.,VanDusseldorp Trisha A.,Feito Yuri

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 ± 6.7 years, 171 ± 14 cm, 74.5 ± 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3-5 days·wk-1for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3-7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. One-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7-8.3%,p= 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5-26.8%,p≤ 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2-59.9%,p< 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4-41.8%,p< 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8-19.1%,p= 0.002), and anaerobic performance (15.4-51.1%,p≤ 0.023) compared to both REC and CON. No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference68 articles.

1. Glassman G. CrossFit training guide level 1.: The CrossFit Journal; 2011.

2. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness;Sports,2018

3. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2018: the CREP edition;ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal,2017

4. CrossFit. Finding the Fittest on Earth. CrossFit Games [Internet]. 2016 August 29, 2019. Available from: https://games.crossfit.com/workouts/open/2016.

5. CrossFit. Welcome to the 2019 CrossFit Games Season. CrossFit Games [Internet]. 2016 August 29, 2019.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3