Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study was to report on the validity of the Naviswiss handheld image-free navigation device for accurate measurement of THA component positioning intraoperatively, in comparison with the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images as gold standard.MethodsA series of patients presenting to a single-surgeon clinic with end-stage hip osteoarthritis received primary hip arthroplasty with anterolateral muscle-sparing surgical approach in the supine position. Imageless navigation was applied during the procedure with bone-mounted trackers applied to the greater trochanter and ASIS. Patients underwent routine CT scans before and after surgery and these were analysed using three-dimensional reconstruction to generate cup orientation, offset and leg length changes which were compared to the intraoperative measurements provided by the navigation system. Estimates of agreement between the intraoperative and image-derived measurements were assessed with and without correction for bias and declared cases with potential measurement issues.ResultsThe mean difference between intraoperative and postoperative CT measurements was within 2° for angular measurements and 2mm for leg length. Absolute differences for the two indices were within 5° and 4mm. Mean bias was 1.9 - 3.6° underestimation for cup orientation and up to 2mm overestimation for leg length change, but absolute thresholds of 10° and 10mm were not exceeded by 95% limits of agreement (LOA), especially after correction for bias. Four cases (12%) were declared intraoperatively for issues with fixation on the greater trochanter. Inclusion of these cases generated acceptable accuracy overall and their omission failed to improve between-case variability in accuracy or LOA for both offset and leg length.ConclusionsThe accuracy of the Naviswiss system applied during primary THA in supine patient position and anterolateral surgical approach falls within clinically acceptable recommendations for acetabular cup placement, femoral offset and length length. With refinements to surgical technique to adapt to the navigation hardware, the system could be further improved with regression-based bias correction.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference30 articles.
1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). (n.d.). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty 2022 Annual Report. AOA. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/732916/AOA+2022+AR+Digital/f63ed890-36d0-c4b3-2e0b-7b63e2071b16
2. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography;International Orthopaedics,2017
3. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies;In Statistical Methods in Medical Research,1999
4. Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using Computer-assisted Navigation in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty;Cureus,2019
5. Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance;The Journal of Arthroplasty,2015