Public awareness of and opinions on the use of mathematical transmission modelling to inform public health policy in the United Kingdom

Author:

McCabe RuthORCID,Donnelly Christl A.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractMathematical transmission modelling is a key component of scientific evidence used to inform public health policy and became particularly prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic. As key stakeholders, it is vital that the public perception of this set of tools is better understood. To complement a previously published article on the science-policy interface by the authors of this study, novel data were collected via responses to a survey via two methods: via an online panel (“representative” sample) and via social media (“non-probability” sample). Many identical questions were asked separately for the period “prior to” compared to “during” the COVID-19 pandemic.All respondents were increasingly aware of the use of modelling in informing policy during the pandemic, with significantly higher levels of awareness among social media respondents than online panel respondents. Awareness generally stemmed from the news media and social media during the pandemic. Transmission modelling informing public health policy was perceived as more reliable during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period in both samples, with awareness being positively associated with reliability within both samples and time points, except for social media during the pandemic. Trust in government public health advice remained high across samples and time periods overall but was lower in the period of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. The decay in trust was notably greater among social media respondents. Many respondents from both samples explicitly made the distinction that their trust was reserved for “scientists” and not “politicians”. Almost all respondents, regardless of sample, believed governments have responsibility for the communication of modelling to the public.These results provide an important reminder of the potentially skewed conclusions that could be drawn from non-representative samples.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. Terms of Reference. UK COVID-19 Inquiry https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/terms-of-reference/ (2022).

2. McCabe, R. & Donnelly, C. A . Disease transmission and control modelling at the science-policy interface. J. R. Soc. Interface Focus (2021).

3. Department of Health and Social Care. Technical report on the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-report-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-the-uk (2022).

4. Role of mathematical modelling in future pandemic response policy

5. A consensus of evidence: The role of SPI-M-O in the UK COVID-19 response

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3