Identification and Description of Emotions by Current Large Language Models

Author:

Patel Suketu C.,Fan JinORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe assertion that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot grasp the subtleties and complexities of human emotions has been a long-standing debate in AI research. However, recent advancements, particularly in large language models (LLMs), have begun challenging this notion by demonstrating an increased capacity for understanding and generating human-like text, a significant step toward artificial empathy and emotional intelligence. In this study, we evaluated the empathy levels and the identification and description of emotions by three current language models Bard, GPT 3.5, and GPT 4. We used the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the 60-question Empathy Quotient (EQ-60) questions to prompt these models and score the responses. The models’ performance was contrasted with human benchmarks of neurotypical controls and clinical populations. We found that the less sophisticated models (Bard and GPT 3.5) performed inferiorly on TAS-20, aligning close to alexithymia, a condition with significant difficulties in recognizing, expressing, and describing one’s or others’ experienced emotions. However, the newest GPT 4 uniquely achieved performance close to the human level, with two sub-categories surpassing humans. Interestingly, there was an intriguing inverse relationship between the model’s success on aptitude tests and performance on the EQ-60, with Bard surpassing the human benchmark significantly but not GPT 3.5 and GPT 4. These results demonstrated that LLMs trained on vast amounts of text data, when benchmarked on their capacity for human-level empathy and emotional intelligence, are comparable in their ability to identify and describe emotions and may be able to surpass humans in their capacity for emotional intelligence. These novel insights into the emotional intelligence capabilities of foundational models provide alignment research and a measurement of the progress and limitations towards aligning with human values. While the journey towards fully empathetic AI is still ongoing, these advancements suggest that it may not be as far-fetched as once believed.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3