Performance of BD Onclarity HPV assay on FLOQSwabs vaginal self-samples

Author:

Martinelli MariannaORCID,Latsuzbaia Ardashel,Bonde Jesper,Pedersen Helle,Iacobone Anna D.,Bottari Fabio,Piana Andrea F.,Pietri Roberto,Cocuzza Clementina E.,Arbyn Marc,

Abstract

AbstractThis study assessed the accuracy of hrHPV testing of BD Onclarity™ HPV (Onclarity) assay on vaginal self-collected FLOQSwab® versus cervical samples to ensure similar accuracy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Testing was performed on two automated platforms, BD Viper™ and BD COR™, to evaluate the effect of machine and using two vaginal self-samples to analyse the influence of collection, transport, and freezing-unfreezing on the results.A cervical sample and two self-samples were collected from 300 women. The first collected vaginal and the cervical sample were tested on BD Viper™ and the second swab was frozen and subsequently tested on both automated systems. Test results on vaginal and cervical specimens were considered the index and comparator, respectively; colposcopy and histology were reference standards.Relative sensitivity for ≥CIN2 on vaginal samples analysed using the three different workflows vs the cervical sample was 1.01 (0.97-1.06), 1.01 (0.97-1.06), and 1.00 (0.95-1.05), respectively.Relative specificity resulted 0.83 (0.73-0.94), 0.76 (0.67-0.87) and 0.82 (0.73-0.92) for the 1st, 2nd self-collected sample tested on BD VIPER™ and 2nd self-collected sample tested on BD COR™.Cut-off optimization for HPV positivity defined at Ct ≤38.3 for HPV16, ≤34.2 for HPV18 and ≤31.5 for all other types showed an increased relative specificity with similar sensitivity. No significant difference was observed between self-samples tested with the two platforms and between first and second-collected swabs.Onclarity assay on FLOQSwab®using both platforms showed similar sensitivity but lower specificity to detect ≥CIN2 compared to cervical samples. By cut-off optimization, non-inferior specificity could be reached.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3