KDM4-dependent DNA breaks at active promoters facilitate +1 nucleosome eviction

Abstract

AbstractWhen the effect of various posttranslational histone tail modifications (PTMs) on nucleosome stability was compared in anin situassay involving agarose-embedded nuclei, the promoter proximal H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H4K8ac positive nucleosomes exhibited relative sensitivity to intercalators as compared to bulk H3-GFP or nucleosomes carrying any of the following marks: H3K27me1, H3K27me2, H3K27me3, H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3K36me3, H3K4me0, H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K9ac, and H3K14ac. Nickase or DNase I treatment of the nuclei, or bleomycin treatment of live cells, did not affect the stability of nucleosomes carrying H3K4me3 or H3K27ac, while those of the second group were all destabilized upon treatment with intercalators. These observations support the possibility that the promoter proximal marks specify dynamic nucleosomes accomodating relaxed DNA sequences due to DNA breaks generatedin vivo. In line with this interpretation, endogeneous, 3’OH nicks were mapped within the nucleosome free region of promoters controlling genes active in human mononuclear cells, a conclusion supported by superresolution colocalization studies. The +1 nucleosomes were stabilized and the incidence of nicks was decreased at the promoters upon KDM4a,b,c KO induction (Pedersen et al, EMBO J, 2016) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mES). While etoposide did not further destabilize +1 nucleosomes in control mES, their stabilized state in the KO state was reversed by the drug. A significant fraction of the DNA breaks comprises TOP2-generated nicks according to the results of molecular combing experiments. The chromatin regions harboring nicks are topologicaly separated from the domains containing superhelical chromatin. These observations lend support for a model where the role of DNA strand discontinuities in transcriptional regulation and in higher-order chromatin organization are integrated.