An Exploratory Study of the Association Between Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores and Postoperative Pain Experience in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author:

Gill Christopher,Giuliano Karen

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOpiate misuse is increasingly common and can result from a single opiate exposure. High pain catastrophizing scores have been linked with greater reported pain and increased opiate use in outpatient studies, but this association has not previously been established in a perioperative setting.MethodsA quantitative, cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 21 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) scores and patients’ ASA Physical Status classifications were collected prior to surgery. Postoperative pain scores were measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and postoperative opiate consumption was measured using modified morphine equivalents (MMEs). Data were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients.ResultsSignificant correlations were found between NRS pain scores at 6 hours post-surgery and 48 hours post-surgery (.455); and NRS pain scores at 6 hours post-surgery and opiate consumption within the first 24 hours post-surgery (.591). A significant correlation was also found between ASA Physical Status classification and total opiate consumption (.522). While rumination scores within the Pain Catastrophizing Scale were also moderately positively correlated with reported pain scores 12 hours post-surgery (.41) and morphine dosing at 48 hours (.40), they were not significant.ConclusionsEarly preemptive pain management is an important component of overall postoperative pain management and to reduce opiate use. Results support that the ASA Physical Status classification scores may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for high opiate use. For the PCS, more data are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of the PCS as an adjunct to overall postoperative pain management.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3