Use of Electronic Health Records to Characterize Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension in Two Large Health System Networks

Author:

Lu YuanORCID,Keeley Ellen C.ORCID,Barrette EricORCID,Cooper-DeHoff Rhonda M.ORCID,Dhruva Sanket S.ORCID,Gaffney Jenny,Gamble Ginger,Handke Bonnie,Huang ChenxiORCID,Krumholz Harlan M.ORCID,McDonough Rowe Caitrin W,Schulz Wade,Shaw Kathryn,Smith Myra,Woodard Jennifer,Young Patrick,Ervin Keondae,Ross Joseph S.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundImproving hypertension control is a public health priority. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal way to identify patients with uncontrolled hypertension using electronic health records (EHR) data.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we applied computable definitions to the EHR data to identify patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension and to evaluate differences in characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes between these patient populations. We included adult patients (≥18 years) with hypertension receiving ambulatory care within Yale-New Haven Health System (YNHHS; a large US health system) and OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium (OneFlorida; a Clinical Research Network comprised of 16 health systems) between October 2015 and December 2018. We identified patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension based on either a single blood pressure (BP) measurement from a randomly selected visit or all BP measurements recorded between hypertension identification and the randomly selected visit).ResultsOverall, 253,207 and 182,827 adults at YNHHS and OneFlorida were identified as having hypertension. Of these patients, 83.1% at YNHHS and 76.8% at OneFlorida were identified using ICD-10-CM codes, whereas 16.9% and 23.2%, respectively, were identified using elevated BP measurements (≥ 140/90 mmHg). Uncontrolled hypertension was observed among 32.5% and 43.7% of patients at YNHHS and OneFlorida, respectively. Uncontrolled hypertension was disproportionately higher among Black patients when compared with White patients (38.9% versus 31.5% in YNHHS; p<0.001; 49.7% versus 41.2% in OneFlorida; p<0.001). Medication prescription for hypertension management was more common in patients with uncontrolled hypertension when compared with those with controlled hypertension (overall treatment rate: 39.3% versus 37.3% in YNHHS; p=0.04; 42.2% versus 34.8% in OneFlorida; p<0.001). Patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension had similar rates of short-term (at 3 and 6 months) and long-term (at 12 and 24 months) clinical outcomes. The two computable definitions generated consistent results.ConclusionsComputable definitions can be successfully applied to health system EHR data to conduct population surveillance for hypertension and identify patients with uncontrolled hypertension who may benefit from additional treatment.Clinical PerspectiveWhat is new?In this retrospective study that included 253,207 and 182,827 hypertensive adults at Yale-New Haven Health System and OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium, we applied two computable definitions to identify patients with uncontrolled hypertension.The two computable definitions generated consistent results and showed that approximately 30-40% of hypertensive patients have uncontrolled hypertension, of whom 60% were untreated or undertreated.What are the clinical implications?Computable definitions can be successfully applied to health system EHR data to conduct population surveillance for hypertension and identify patients with uncontrolled hypertension who may benefit from additional treatment.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. Adams JM and Wright JS . A National Commitment to Improve the Care of Patients With Hypertension in the US. JAMA. 2020.

2. Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018;JAMA,2020

3. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Circulation,2017

4. Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems: Implications for Outcomes Research

5. Utilizing Medicare claims data for real-time drug safety evaluations: is it feasible?,

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3