A test of time-resolved functional MRI with sub-second event durations

Author:

Wong Alvin P.H.ORCID,Wu Esther X.W.,Rogers Baxter P.,Asplund Christopher L.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractFunctional neuroimaging (fMRI) signals are famously sluggish, unfolding over several seconds after even brief sensory (and neural) events. Relative timing differences between different evoking conditions, however, can distinguish between changes in the duration or intensity of neural activity (Henson et al., 2002). Specifically, increases in stimulus duration cause a delayed response peak with a greater amplitude, whereas increases in stimulus intensity affect the peak magnitude alone. These relationships have been empirically demonstrated using stimulus durations of several seconds (Friston, 2005), but many processes relevant to cognitive psychology occur on sub-second timescales. Here we tested whether the predicted relationship between stimulus properties and the hemodynamic response held for sub-second stimuli and sub-second changes in stimulus duration. In Experiment 1 (n=15), we presented visual and auditory stimuli at three durations (100, 300, and 900 ms) and three intensities in a slow event-related design with a rapid TR (625 ms). In Experiment 2 (n=14), the stimulus durations were extended (1000, 1200, and 1800 ms) to increase the evoked signal. By fitting the observed fMRI signals to parameterised hemodynamic response functions, we found that changes in stimulus duration caused differences in peak latency and magnitude, whereas changes in stimulus intensity affected only peak magnitude. Significant effects were found for duration differences as small as 200 ms, with clearer results when a sufficiently large base signal was evoked and when a bootstrap resampling technique was used. Our results support the validity of existing models of the hemodynamic response. They also support the use of time-resolved fMRI for mental chronometry in cognitive neuroscience, thereby allowing researchers to draw additional inferences about brief mental events.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3