Abstract
AbstractWe continuously detect sensory data, like sights and sounds, and use this information to guide our behaviour. However, rather than relying on single sensory channels, which are noisy and can be ambiguous alone, we merge information across our senses and leverage this combined signal. In biological networks, this process (multisensory integration) is implemented by multimodal neurons which are often thought to receive the information accumulated by unimodal areas, and to fuse this across channels; an algorithm we term accumulate-then-fuse. However, it remains an open question how well this theory generalises beyond the classical tasks used to test multimodal integration. Here, we explore this by developing novel multimodal tasks and deploying probabilistic, artificial and spiking neural network models. Using these models we demonstrate that multimodal units are not necessary for accuracy or balancing speed/accuracy in classical multimodal tasks, but are critical in a novel set of tasks in which we comodulate signals across channels. We show that these comodulation tasks require multimodal units to implement an alternative fuse-then-accumulate algorithm, which excels in naturalistic settings and is optimal for a wide class of multimodal problems. Finally, we link our findings to experimental results at multiple levels; from single neurons to behaviour. Ultimately, our work suggests that multimodal neurons may fuse-then-accumulate evidence across channels, and provides novel tasks and models for exploring this in biological systems.1Key PointsWe demonstrate that multimodal units arenotnecessary for accuracy or balancing speed/accuracy in classical multisensory tasks.We introduce a novel set of tasks, based on comodulating the signals from multiple channels, in which multimodal units arecritical.We show that multimodal units enable networks to implement afuse-then-accumulatealgorithm, which excels in naturalistic settings, like predator-prey interactions, and is optimal for a wide class of multimodal problems.Finally, we explore the link betweensingle neurons propertiesandnetwork behaviour.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference22 articles.
1. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages;Sensory communication,1961
2. Julia Trommershauser , Konrad Kording , and Michael S Landy . Sensory cue integration. Oxford University Press, 2011.
3. David Marr . Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. MIT press, 1982.
4. Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration
5. D. Marr and T. Poggio . From Understanding Computation to Understanding Neural Circuitry. techreport, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1976.