A conceptualisation and psychometric evaluation of positive psychological outcome measures used in adolescents and young adults living with HIV: a mixed scoping and systematic review

Author:

Dambi Jermaine M.ORCID,Cowan Frances M.,Martin FaithORCID,Sibanda Sharon,Simms Victoria,Willis Nicola,Bernays Sarah,Mavhu WebsterORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionSub-Saharan Africa bears the greatest burden of HIV/mental disorders combined. It is important to evaluate the mental health of adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYALHIV) comprehensively by measuring both negative and positive psychological constructs. There has been a proliferation of interest in positive psychological outcome measures, but the evidence of their psychometric robustness is fragmented. This review sought to:Identify positive psychological outcomes and corresponding outcome measures used in AYALHIV in sub-Saharan AfricaCritically appraise the psychometrics of the identified outcome measuresMethods and analysisIndependent and blinded reviewers searched articles in PubMed, Scopus, Africa-Wide Information, CINAHL, Psych INFO, and Google Scholar. Separate independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles. We applied a narrative synthesis to map the key constructs. The risk of bias across studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of the psychometric properties was rated using the COSMIN checklist and qualitatively synthesised using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation checklist.ResultsWe identified 15 positive psychological constructs: body appreciation, confidence, coping, flourishing, meaningfulness, personal control, positive outlook, resilience, self-management, self-compassion, self-concept, self-efficacy, self-esteem, self-worth and transcendence that had been used to assess ALHIV. Resilience, self-concept, self-esteem, coping and self-efficacy were the most measured constructs. Construct validity and internal consistency were the properties most frequently assessed, while content validity and structural validity were assessed less often.ConclusionsFew studies performed complete validations; thus, evidence for psychometric robustness was fragmented. However, this review shows the initial evidence of the feasibility of using positive psychological outcomes in low-resource settings. Instead of creating new outcomes, researchers are recommended to leverage the existing measures, adapt them for use, and, if appropriate, strive to maintain the factorial structure to facilitate comparisons.RegistrationPROSPERO-CRD42022325172

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3