Abstract
AbstractWe present normative data for bipartite displays used to investigate high-level contributions to object perception in general and to figure-ground perception in particular. In these vertically-elongated displays, two equal-area regions of different luminance abut a central, articulated, vertical border. In Intact displays, a portion of a mono-oriented well-known (“familiar”) object is sketched along one side of the border; henceforth the “critical side.” The other side is the “complementary side.” We measured inter-subject agreement among 32 participants regarding objects depicted on the critical and complementary sides of the borders of Intact displays and two other types of displays: upright and inverted Part-Rearranged displays. The parts on the critical side of the border are the same in upright Intact and Part-Rearranged displays but spatially rearranged into a new configuration in the latter. Inter-subject agreement is taken to index the extent to which a side activates traces of previously seen objects near the central border. We report normative data for 288 regions near the central borders of 144 displays (48/type) and a thorough description of the image features. This set of stimuli is larger than an older “Object Memory Effects on Figure Assignment” (OMEFA) set. This new OMEFA-II set of high-resolution displays is available online (https://osf.io/j9kz2/).
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference26 articles.
1. Hochberg J. Perception I: Color and shape. In: Kling JW , Riggs LA , editors. Woodworth and Schlossberg’s experimental psychology. New York, NY; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971:395–474.
2. Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril
3. Rubin, E. Figure and ground. In Beardslee DC , Wertheimer M , editors. Readings in perception. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1915/1958:194–203.
4. A new cue to figure–ground coding: top–bottom polarity