Abstract
AbstractTinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is a prevalent condition that imposes a substantial health and financial burden on the patient and to society. The diagnosis of tinnitus, like pain, relies on patient self-report. Subjective self-report measures can complicate the distinction between actual and fraudulent claims and obscure accurate severity assessments. In this study, we combined tablet-based self-directed hearing assessments with neural network classifiers to objectively determine tinnitus severity, and to differentiate participants with tinnitus (N=24) from a malingering cohort, who were instructed to feign an imagined tinnitus percept (N=28). We identified clear differences between the groups, both in their overt rating of tinnitus severity but also covert differences in their fingertip movement trajectories on the tablet surface as they performed the reporting assay. Using only 10 minutes of data, we achieved 81% accuracy classifying patients vs malingerers (ROC AUC=0.88) with leave-one-participant-out cross validation. Objective measurements of tinnitus will improve estimates of tinnitus prevalence and help to prioritize and direct funds for tinnitus compensation.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory