Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitalized patients received empiric hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (HC/CQ). Although some retrospective-observational trials suggested potential benefit, all subsequent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) failed to show benefit and use generally ceased. Herein, we summarize key studies that clinicians advising patients on HC/CQ’s efficacy:safety calculus in hospitalized COVID-19 patients would want to know about in a practical one-stop-shopping source.MethodsPubmed and Google were searched on November 4, 2021. Search words included: COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, in vitro, animal studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses. Studies were assessed for import and included if considered impactful for benefit:risk assessment.ResultsThese searches led to inclusion of 12 in vitro and animal reports; 12 retrospective-observational trials, 19 interventional clinical trials (17 RCTs, 1 single-arm, 1 controlled but unblinded), and 51 meta-analyses in hospitalized patients.Inconsistent efficacy was seen in vitro and in animal studies for coronaviruses and nil in SARS-CoV-2 animal models specifically. Most retrospective-observational studies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients found no efficacy; QT prolongation and increased adverse events and mortality were reported in some. All RCTs and almost all meta-analyses provided robust data showing no benefit in overall populations and subgroups, yet concerning safety issues in many.ConclusionsHC/CQ have inconsistent anti-coronavirus efficacy in vitro and in animal models, and no convincing efficacy yet substantial safety issues in the overwhelming majority of retrospective-observational trials, RCTs, and meta-analyses in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. HC/CQ should not be prescribed for hospitalized COVID-19 patients outside of clinical trials.Key Summary PointsPreclinical hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in vitro studies found inconsistent activity against coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2.Preclinical hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine animals studies found inconsistent efficacy for coronaviruses in general and none for SARS-CoV-2.The overhwelming majority of RCTs and retrospective-observational trials found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and many found concerning safety signals.The majority of RCTs and retrospective-observational trials found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in COVID-19 outpatients or for pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis, and some found concerning safety signals.The overwhelming majority of meta-analyses found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in COVID-19 inpatients, outpatients, or for prophylaxis, and many found concerning safety signals.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference92 articles.
1. Use of Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, and Dexamethasone Among Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the United States;A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Int Med,2021
2. Wilson K , Chotirmall SH , Bai C , Rello J. Interim Guidance on Management Pending Empirical Evidence. From an American Thoracic Society-led International Task Force: From an American Thoracic Society-led International Task Force; 2020 [Available from: https://www.thoracic.org/covid/covid-19-guidance.pdf.
3. Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis and treatment is ineffective in macaque and hamster SARS-CoV-2 disease models;JCI Insight,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献