General practitioner wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

Author:

Jefferson Laura,Heathcote Claire,Bloor Karen

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWorkload pressures and poor job satisfaction have been reported by UK general practitioners (GPs) for some time. The COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges, with growing international evidence of its negative impact on GPs’ mental health and wellbeing. While there has been wide commentary on this topic, UK research evidence is lacking. Developing greater understanding of these lived experiences and subgroup differences is important as doctor wellbeing may affect the sustainability of health care systems and quality of patient care.ObjectivesTo explore the lived experience of UK GPs during COVID-19, and the pandemic’s impact on their psychological wellbeing.Design and SettingIn-depth qualitative interviews, conducted remotely by telephone or video call, with NHS GPs.ParticipantsGPs were sampled purposively across three career stages (early career, established and late career or retired GPs) with variation in other key demographics. A comprehensive recruitment strategy used multiple channels. Data were analysed thematically using Framework Analysis.ResultsWe interviewed 40 GPs; most described generally negative sentiment and many displayed signs of psychological distress and burnout. Causes of stress and anxiety related to personal risk, workload, practice changes, public perceptions and leadership, teamworking and wider collaboration and personal challenges. GPs described facilitators of their wellbeing, including sources of support and plans to reduce clinical hours or change career path.ConclusionsA range of factors detrimentally affected the wellbeing of GPs during the pandemic and we highlight the potential impact of this on workforce retention and quality of care. As the pandemic progresses and general practice faces continued challenges, urgent policy measures are now needed.Strengths and limitations of this studyWhile there is growing international evidence base demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on GPs’ wellbeing and much UK media coverage, this qualitative interview study provides much-needed research evidence of UK GPs’ lived experiences and wellbeing during COVID-19.40 GPs were sampled purposively to include GPs with different demographic and practice characteristics.While there are no easy solutions to the problems highlighted, this research provides increased contextualised understanding of how these experiences may impact future workforce retention and the sustainability of health systems longer-term.Sub-group differences by gender and age are reported; highlighting a potential need for further research and support targeted at specific groups.Findings are necessarily limited to the time of data collection (Spring/Summer 2021); further tensions in general practice have since arisen, particularly regarding negative and misleading media portrayal.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference34 articles.

1. King’s Fund. Closing the gap report. Chapter 7: modelling the impact of reform and funding on nursing and GP shortages: Available online: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-03/closing-the-gap-health-care-workforce-full-report.pdf#page=107 (last accessed 05/08/21). 2019.

2. BMA. Caring for the mental health of the medical workforce. Available online: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1365/bma-caring-for-the-mental-health-survey-oct-2019.pdf (last accessed 05/08/21). London 2019.

3. GMC. The state of medical education and practice in the UK. Available online: https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/what-we-do-and-why/data-and-research/the-state-of-medical-education-and-practice-in-the-uk (last accessed 05/08/21). 2019.

4. Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study

5. Gibson J , Sutton M , Spooner S , Checkland K. Ninth National GP Worklife Survey.. University of Manchester: Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System Manchester Centre for Health Economics. 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3