Effect of habitual reading direction on saccadic eye movements

Abstract

AbstractCognitive processes can influence the characteristics of saccadic eye movements. Reading habits, including habitual reading direction, also affects cognitive and visuospatial processes, favouring attention to the side where reading begins. Few studies have investigated the effect of habitual reading direction on saccade directionality of low-cognitive-demand stimuli (such as dots). The current study examined horizontal prosaccade, antisaccade and self-paced saccade in subjects with two primary habitual reading directions. We hypothesised that saccades responding to the target in subject’s habitual reading direction would show a longer prosaccade latency and lower antisaccade error rate (errors being a reflexive glance to a sudden-appearing target, rather than a saccade away from it). Sixteen young Chinese participants with primary habitual reading direction from left to right and sixteen young Arabic and Persian participants with primary habitual reading direction from right to left were recruited. Subjects needed to look towards a 5°/ 10°target in the prosaccade task or look towards the mirror image location of the target in the antisaccade task and look between two 10-degree targets in the self-paced saccade task. Only Arabic and Persian participants showed a shorter and directional prosaccade latency towards 5°target against their habitual reading direction. No significant effect of primary reading direction on antisaccade latency towards the correct directions was found. However, we found that Chinese readers generated significantly shorter prosaccade latencies and higher antisaccade directional errors compared with Arabic and Persian readers. The present study provides an insight into the effect of reading habits on saccadic eye movements in response to low-cognitive-demand stimuli and offers a platform for future studies to investigate the relationship between reading habits and neural mechanisms of eye movement behaviours.