Testing federated analytics across secure data environments using differing statistical approaches on cross-disciplinary data

Author:

Gallier S.ORCID,Topham A.,Hodson J.,McNulty D.,Giles T.,Cox S.,Chaganty J.,Cooper L.,Perks S.,Quinlan P.,Sapey E.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDIntroducing data-driven technologies into health systems can enhance population health and streamline care delivery. The use of diverse and geographically varied data is key for tackling health and societal challenges, despite associated technical, ethical, and governance complexities. This study explored the efficacy of federated analytics using general linear models (GLMs) and machine learning (ML) models, comparing outcomes with non-federated data analysis.METHODSA Conditional Transformation Generative Adversarial Network was used to create two synthetic datasets (training set: N=10,000; test set: N=1,000), using real-world data from 381 asthma patients. To simulate a federated environment, the resulting data were distributed across nodes in a Microsoft Azure Trusted Research Environment (TRE). GLMs (one-way ANOVA) and ML models (gradient boosted decision trees) where then produced, using both federated and non-federated approaches. The consistency of predictions produced by the ML models were then compared between approaches, with predictive accuracy of the models quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).FINDINGSGLMs produced from federated data distributed between two TREs were identical to those produced using a non-federated approach. However, ML models produced by federated and non-federated approaches, and using different data distributions between TREs, were non-identical. Despite this, when applied to the test set, the classifications made by the federated models were consistent with the non-federated model in 84.7-90.4% of cases, which was similar to the consistency of repeated non-federated models (90.9-91.5%). Consequently, overall predictive accuracies for federated and non-federated models were similar (AUROC: 0.663-0.669).INTERPRETATIONThis study confirmed the robustness of GLMs utilising ANOVA within a federated framework, yielding consistent outcomes. Moreover, federated ML models demonstrated a high degree of classification agreement, with comparable accuracy to traditional non-federated models. These results highlight the viability of federated approaches for reliable and accurate data analysis in sensitive domains.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference24 articles.

1. World Health Organisation. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. https://wwwwhoint/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4dpdf. 2021;Date of access 18th April 2023.

2. Government H. Life Sciences Vision. 2021.

3. Goldacre B , Morley J. Better, Broader, Safer: Using health data for research and analysis. A review commissioned by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. Department of Health and Social Care.; 2022.

4. UK HDR. HDR UK - Recommendations for Data Standards in Health Data Research. 2021.

5. UK HDR. Trusted Research Environments and data management - Past, Present and Future. 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3