SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of T2-weighted Hyperintense Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury

Author:

Enamundram Naga KarthikORCID,Valosek JanORCID,Smith Andrew C.ORCID,Pfyffer DarioORCID,Schading-Sassenhausen SimonORCID,Farner LynnORCID,Weber Kenneth A.ORCID,Freund PatrickORCID,Cohen-Adad JulienORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundQuantitative MRI biomarkers in spinal cord injury (SCI) can help understand the extent of the focal injury. However, due to the lack of automatic segmentation methods, these biomarkers are derived manually, which is a time-consuming process prone to intra- and inter-rater variability, thus limiting large multi-site studies and translation to clinical workflows.PurposeTo develop a deep learning tool for the automatic segmentation of T2-weighted hyperintense lesions and the spinal cord in SCI patients.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included a cohort of SCI patients from three sites enrolled between July 2002 and February 2023 who underwent clinical MRI examination. A deep learning model,SCIseg, was trained on T2-weighted images with heterogeneous image resolutions (isotropic, anisotropic), and orientations (axial, sagittal) acquired using scanners from different manufacturers (Siemens, Philips, GE) and different field strengths (1T, 1.5T, 3T) for the automatic segmentation of SCI lesions and the spinal cord. The proposed method was visually and quantitatively compared with other open-source baseline methods. Quantitative biomarkers (lesion volume, lesion length, and maximal axial damage ratio) computed from manual ground-truth lesion masks and automaticSCIsegpredictions were correlated with clinical scores (pinprick, light touch, and lower extremity motor scores). A between-group comparison was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsMRI data from 191 SCI patients (mean age, 48.1 years ± 17.9 [SD]; 142 males) were used for training. Compared to existing methods,SCIsegachieved the best segmentation performance for both the cord and lesions and generalized well to both traumatic and non-traumatic SCI patients.SCIsegis open-source and accessible through the Spinal Cord Toolbox.ConclusionAutomatic segmentation of intramedullary lesions commonly seen in traumatic SCI replaces the tedious manual annotation process and enables the extraction of relevant lesion morphometrics in large cohorts. The proposed model generalizes across lesion etiologies (traumatic, ischemic), scanner manufacturers and heterogeneous image resolutions.SummaryAutomatic segmentation of the spinal cord and T2-weighted hyperintense lesions in spinal cord injury on MRI scans across different treatment strategies, lesion etiologies, sites, scanner manufacturers, and heterogeneous image resolutions.Key ResultsAn open-source, automatic method,SCIseg, was trained on a dataset of 191 spinal cord injury patients from three sites for the segmentation of spinal cord and T2-weighted hyperintense lesions.SCIseggeneralizes across traumatic and non-traumatic lesions, scanner manufacturers, and heterogeneous image resolutions, enabling the automatic extraction of lesion morphometrics in large multi-site cohorts.Morphometrics derived from the automatic predictions showed no statistically significant difference when compared with manual ground truth, implying reliability inSCIseg’spredictions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference35 articles.

1. Traumatic spinal cord injury;Nat Rev Dis Primers,2017

2. Traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury: pathological insights from neuroimaging

3. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients;Radiology. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA),2007

4. Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury;Eur Spine J,2023

5. Are midsagittal tissue bridges predictive of outcome after cervical spinal cord injury?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3