Springs vs. motors: Ideal assistance in the lower limbs during walking at different speeds

Abstract

AbstractRecent years have witnessed breakthroughs in assistive exoskeletons; both passive and active devices have reduced metabolic costs near preferred walking speed by assisting muscle actions. Metabolic reductions at multiple speeds should thus also be attainable. Musculoskeletal simulation can potentially predict the interaction between assistive moments, muscle-tendon mechanics, and walking energetics. In this study, we simulated devices’ optimal assistive moments based on minimal muscle activations during walking with prescribed kinematics and dynamics. We used a generic musculoskeletal model with calibrated muscle-tendon parameters and computed metabolic rates from muscle actions. We then simulated walking across multiple speeds and with two ideal actuation modes – motor-based and spring-based – to assist ankle plantarflexion, knee extension, hip flexion, and hip abduction and compared computed metabolic rates. We found that both actuation modes considerably reduced physiological joint moments but did not always reduce metabolic rates. Compared to unassisted conditions, motor-based ankle plantarflexion and hip flexion assistance reduced metabolic rates, and this effect was more pronounced as walking speed increased. Spring-based hip flexion and abduction assistance increased metabolic rates at some walking speeds despite a moderate decrease in some muscle activations. Both modes of knee extension assistance reduced metabolic rates to a small extent, even though the actuation contributed with practically the entire net knee extension moment during stance. Motor-based hip abduction assistance reduced metabolic rates more than spring-based assistance, though this reduction was relatively small. Future work should experimentally validate the effects of assistive moments and refine modeling assumptions accordingly. Our computational workflow is freely available online.Author SummaryWe used simulation to identify ideal assistance at major lower limb joints that can potentially be produced by motor-based or spring-based assistive devices in slow, normal, and fast walking. We found that assistance from both actuation modes decreased muscle activations and net muscle moments to varying extents, depending on joint and walking speed, but they did not always reduce metabolic energy of muscles. Motor-based assistance was overall more effective than spring-based assistance, and spring-based assistance at times increased the metabolic energy. The largest metabolic energy reductions occurred with motor-based plantarflexion assistance, followed by motor-based hip flexion assistance, both more notably at higher speeds. Motor-based hip abduction assistance also reduced metabolic energy, somewhat inversely with walking speed. Spring-based assistance was overall less effective than motor-based assistance but did reduce metabolic energy with plantarflexion assistance in slow walking and with hip flexion assistance in fast walking. Knee extension assistance, regardless of actuation mode or walking speed, had little to no influence on metabolic energy. Our simulation findings do not support knee extension assistance at all, nor spring-based hip flexion assistance in slow walking or hip abduction assistance at any speed if a device goal is to reduce muscle activations.