Abstract
AbstractRegulation of transcription by DNA methylation in 5’-CpG-3’ context is a widespread mechanism allowing differential expression of genetically identical cells to persist throughout development. Consequently, differences in DNA methylation can reinforce variation in gene expression among cells, tissues, populations and species. Despite a surge in studies on DNA methylation, we know little about the importance of DNA methylation in population differentiation and speciation. Here we investigate the regulatory and evolutionary impact of DNA methylation in five tissues of twoFicedulaflycatcher species and their naturally occurring F1hybrids. We show that the density of CpG in the promoters of genes determines the strength of the association between gene expression and DNA methylation. The impact of DNA methylation on gene expression varies among tissues with brain showing unique patterns. Differentially expressed genes between parental species are predicted by genetic– and methylation differentiation in CpG-rich promoters. However, both these factors fail to predict hybrid misexpression suggesting that promoter mismethylation is not a main determinant of hybrid misexpression inFicedulaflycatchers. Using allele-specific methylation estimates in hybrids we also determine the genome-wide contribution ofcis-andtranseffects in DNA methylation differentiation. These distinct mechanisms are roughly balanced in all tissues except brain, wheretransdifferences predominate. Overall, this study provides insight on the regulatory and evolutionary impact of DNA methylation in songbirds.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference110 articles.
1. Reifová R , Ament-Velásquez SL , Bourgeois Y , Coughlan J , Kulmuni J , Lipinska AP , et al. Mechanisms of Intrinsic Postzygotic Isolation: From Traditional Genic and Chromosomal Views to Genomic and Epigenetic Perspectives. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023;:a041607.
2. Bateson W. Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Seward AC , editor. Darwin and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1909. p. 85–101.
3. Studies on hybrid sterility – I. Spermatogenesis in pure and hybrid Drosophila pseudoobscura;. Zeitschrift für Zellforsch und Mikroskopische Anat,1934
4. Muller HJ . Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. In: Huxley JS , editor. The New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1940. p. 185–268.
5. Coughlan JM , Matute DR . The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2020;375.