Durability of protection from original monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes among adults in the United States — September 2022–August 2023

Author:

DeCuir JenniferORCID,Surie Diya,Zhu Yuwei,Lauring Adam S.,Gaglani ManjushaORCID,McNeal Tresa,Ghamande Shekhar,Peltan Ithan D.,Brown Samuel M.,Ginde Adit A.,Steinwand Aimee,Mohr Nicholas M.ORCID,Gibbs Kevin W.,Hager David N.,Ali Harith,Frosch Anne,Gong Michelle N.,Mohamed Amira,Johnson Nicholas J.,Srinivasan Vasisht,Steingrub Jay S.,Khan Akram,Busse Laurence W.,Duggal Abhijit,Wilson Jennifer G.,Qadir Nida,Chang Steven Y.,Mallow Christopher,Kwon Jennie H.,Exline Matthew C.,Shapiro Nathan I.,Columbus Cristie,Vaughn Ivana A.,Ramesh Mayur,Safdar Basmah,Mosier Jarrod M.,Casey Jonathan D.,Talbot H. Keipp,Rice Todd W.,Halasa Natasha,Chappell James D.,Grijalva Carlos G.ORCID,Baughman Adrienne,Womack Kelsey N.,Rhoads Jillian P.,Swan Sydney A.,Johnson Cassandra,Lewis Nathaniel,Ellington SaschaORCID,McMorrow MeredithORCID,Self Wesley H.,

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo evaluate the durability of protection provided by original monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes.DesignMulticenter case-control design with prospective enrollmentSetting26 hospitals in 20 US statesParticipantsAdults aged ≥18 years admitted to hospital with COVID-19-like illness from 8 September 2022 to 31 August 2023Main outcome measuresThe main outcomes were absolute and relative vaccine effectiveness of original monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes, including advanced respiratory support (defined as receipt of high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]) and IMV or death. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using multivariable logistic regression, in which the odds of vaccination (versus being unvaccinated or receiving original monovalent vaccination only) were compared between COVID-19 case patients and control-patients. Bivalent vaccine effectiveness analyses were stratified by time since dose receipt.ResultsAmong 7028 adults without immunocompromising conditions, 2924 (41.6%) were COVID-19 case patients and 4104 (58.4%) were control patients. Compared to unvaccinated patients, absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was 6% (-7% to 17%) for original monovalent doses only (median time since last dose [IQR] = 421 days [304–571]), 52% (39% to 61%) for a bivalent dose received 7–89 days earlier, and 13% (-10% to 31%) for a bivalent dose received 90–179 days earlier. Absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated advanced respiratory support was 31% (15% to 45%) for original monovalent doses only, 66% (47% to 78%) for a bivalent dose received 7–89 days earlier, and 33% (-1% to 55%) for a bivalent dose received 90–179 days earlier. Absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated IMV or death was 51% (34% to 63%) for original monovalent doses only, 61% (35% to 77%) for a bivalent dose received 7–89 days earlier, and 50% (11% to 71%) for a bivalent dose received 90–179 days earlier.ConclusionWhen compared to original monovalent vaccination only, bivalent COVID-19 vaccination provided additional protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and certain severe in-hospital outcomes within 3 months of dose receipt. By 3-6 months, protection from a bivalent dose declined to a level similar to that remaining from original monovalent vaccination only. Although no protection remained from original monovalent vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, it provided durable protection against severe in-hospital outcomes >1 year after receipt of the last dose, particularly against IMV or death.SUMMARY BOXWhat is already known on this topic-On September 1, 2022, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was recommended for US adults who had completed at least an original monovalent COVID-19 primary series.-Early estimates of bivalent vaccine effectiveness are available for the period soon after dose receipt; however fewer data exist on their durability of protection and effectiveness against severe outcomes.What this study adds-When compared to original monovalent vaccination only, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination provided additional protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and certain severe in-hospital outcomes within 3 months of dose receipt. By 3-6 months, protection from a bivalent dose declined to a level similar to that remaining from original monovalent vaccination only.-Although no protection remained from original monovalent vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, it provided durable protection against severe in-hospital outcomes >1 year after receipt of the last dose, particularly against invasive mechanical ventilation or death.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3