Social inequalities in COVID-19 deaths by area-level income: patterns over time and the mediating role of vaccination in a population of 11.2 million people in Ontario, Canada

Author:

Wang Linwei,Swayze Sarah,Bodner Korryn,Calzavara Andrew,Harrigan Sean P.,Siddiqi Arjumand,Baral Stefan D.,Austin Peter C.,Smylie Janet,Koh Maria,Sbihi Hind,Sander Beate,Kwong Jeffrey C.,Mishra Sharmistha

Abstract

ABSTRACTImportanceSocial inequalities in COVID-19 deaths were evident early in the pandemic. Less is known about how vaccination may have influenced inequalities in COVID-19 deaths.ObjectivesTo examine patterns in COVID-19 deaths by area-level income over time and to examine the impact of vaccination on inequality patterns in COVID-19 deaths.Design, setting, and participantsPopulation-based retrospective cohort study including community-living individuals aged ≥18 years residing in Ontario, Canada, as of March 1, 2020 who were followed through to January 30, 2022 (five pandemic waves).ExposureArea-level income derived from the 2016 Census at the level of dissemination area categorized into quintiles. Vaccination defined as receiving ≥ 1 dose of Johnson-Johnson vaccine or ≥ 2 doses of other vaccines.Main outcome measuresCOVID-19 death defined as death within 30 days following, or 7 days prior to a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Cause-specific hazard models were used to examine the relationship between income and COVID-19 deaths in each wave. We used regression-based causal mediation analyses to examine the impact of vaccination in the relationship between income and COVID-19 deaths during waves four and five.ResultsOf 11,248,572 adults, 7044 (0.063%) experienced a COVID-19 death. After accounting for demographics, baseline health, and area-level social determinants of health, inequalities in COVID-19 deaths by income persisted over time (adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% confidence intervals] comparing lowest-income vs. highest-income quintiles were 1.37[0.98-1.92] for wave one, 1.21[0.99-1.48] for wave two, 1.55[1.22-1.96] for wave three, and 1.57[1.15-2.15] for waves four and five). Of 11,122,816 adults alive by the start of wave four, 7,534,259(67.7%) were vaccinated, with lower odds of vaccination in the lowest-income compared to highest-income quintiles (0.71[0.70-0.71]). This inequality in vaccination accounted for 57.9%[21.9%-94.0%] of inequalities in COVID-19 deaths between individuals in the lowest-income vs. highest-income quintiles.ConclusionsInequalities by income persisted in COVID-19 deaths over time. Efforts are needed to address both vaccination gaps and residual heightened risks associated with lower income to improve health equity in COVID-19 outcomes.Summary boxSection 1: What is already known on this topicEmerging data suggest social inequalities in COVID-19 deaths might have persisted over time, but existing studies were limited by their ecological design and/or inability to account for potential confounders.Vaccination has contributed to reducing COVID-19 deaths but there were social inequalities in vaccination coverage.The impact of inequalities in vaccination on inequalities in COVID-19 deaths has not yet been well-studied.Section 2: What this study addsAcross five pandemic waves (2020-2021) in Ontario, Canada, COVID-19 deaths remained higher in individuals living in lower-income neighbourhoods, even after accounting for individual-level demographics and baseline health, and other area-level social determinants of health.During later waves (following the vaccination roll-out), over half (57.9%) of the inequalities in COVID-19 deaths between individuals living in the lowest and highest income neighbourhoods could be attributed to differential vaccination coverage by income. This means that if vaccine equality was achieved, inequalities in deaths would persist but be reduced.Addressing vaccination gaps, as well as addressing the residual heightened risks of COVID-19 associated with lower income could improve health equity in COVID-19 outcomes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3