Analysis of multiple causes of death: a review of methods and practices

Author:

Bishop Karen,Balogun SaliuORCID,Eynstone-Hinkins James,Moran Lauren,Martin MelonieORCID,Banks EmilyORCID,Rao ChalapatiORCID,Joshy GraceORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundResearch and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics - reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns - is recognised internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant multiple cause analytical methods and practices.MethodsWe searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles included those analysing multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 articles; after screening, 434 full texts were reviewed.ResultsMost reviewed articles (77%, n=332) were published since 2001. The majority examined mortality by “any-mention” of a cause of death (87%, n=377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (56%, n=245). Recently emerging (since 2001) were applications of methods to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n=9), and the application of multiple cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n=5). Multiple cause methods applied to specific research objectives are described for recently emerging approaches.ConclusionThis review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview of methods and practices to date. Available multiple cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives, that with greater data availability and technology could be further developed and applied across a range of settings.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3