Fair Reinforcement Learning for Maternal Sepsis Treatment

Author:

Carey SiânORCID,McInerney Ciarán,Lawton Tom,Habli Ibrahim,Johnson Owen,Fahel Leila,Kotzé Alwyn,de Kamps Marc

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesReinforcement Learning is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) which has the potential to support significant improvement in patient care. There is concern that such approaches may reinforce existing biases within patient groups. Understanding discrimination in AI models is important for building trust and ensuring fair and safe use. We explore the fairness of a published reinforcement learning model, used to suggest drug dosages for sepsis treatment of patients in critical care, on whether it safe to use with maternal sepsis patients.MethodsWe evaluate the current model using by a) comparing the results for a group of patients with maternal sepsis against a matched control group and b) using random forests to explore feature importance in the model.ResultsOur results show that the original clinicians’ decisions and model suggestions were similar across cohorts. Our feature importance ranking shows high variance for many of the features.DiscussionIn medical settings, different subgroups may have specific clinical needs and require different treatment however, in the absence of a clinical consensus on the most appropriate treatment, AI algorithms that give consistent treatment to patients regardless of subgroup could be judged as the safest and fairest option.ConclusionOur experiments showed that the evaluated model gave the same treatment to maternal and non-maternal sepsis patients. The methods developed for evaluating fair reinforcement learning may be more generally applicable to understanding how clinical AI tools can be used for safely and fairly.What is already known on this topicThe use of reinforcement learning to suggest drug dosages for sepsis patients in critical care is a well-researched area, with multiple open-source models available. It has not previously been considered whether these models can be used on maternal sepsis patients.What this study addsThe model studied behaves consistently on maternal and non-maternal sepsis patients, and appears to suggest an increased use of vasopressors compared with historical actions.How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study shows that it is possible to design models which are consistent across maternal and non-maternal sepsis patients, suggesting that a single model may be appropriate across a variety of patients with sepsis.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. Singer M , Deutschman C , Seymour C , et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). American Medical Association 2016. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881

2. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations

3. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority — A WHO Resolution

4. Jia Y , Lawton T , Burden J , et al. Safety-driven design of machine learning for sepsis treatment. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2021;117.

5. WHO. WHO | Maternal sepsis. WHO. 2020.http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/maternal-sepsis/en/ (accessed 10 Aug 2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3