Duration of referral-to-death and its influencing factors among cancer and non-cancer patients: perspective from a community palliative care setting in Malaysia

Author:

Yip Yan YeeORCID,Hwong Wen YeaORCID,McCarthy Sylvia Ann,Hassan Chin Aidah AbdulORCID,Woon Yuan LiangORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo compare the referral-to-death duration among palliative cancer and non-cancer patients and to determine its influencing factors in a Malaysian community hospice.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included decedents referred to palliative care in a community hospice between January 2017 to December 2019. Referral-to-death is the interval between first referral date to date of death. Besides descriptive analyses, negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with referral-to-death duration among both groups.ResultsOf 4346 patients referred, 86.7% (n=3766) and 13.3% (n=580) had primary diagnoses of cancer and non-cancer respectively. Median referral-to-death was 32 days (IQR:12-81) among cancer patients and 19 days (IQR:7-78) among non-cancer patients. The shortest referral-to-death duration among cancer patients were for liver cancer (Median:22 days,IQR:8-58.5). Non-cancer patients with dementia, heart failure and multisystem failure had the shortest referral-to-death duration at 14 days. Among cancer patients, longer referral-to-death duration was associated with women compared to men (IRR:1.26,95%CI:1.16-1.36) and patients aged 80 to 94 years old compared to below 50 years old (IRR:1.19,95%CI:1.02-1.38). Cancer patients with analgesics prescribed before palliative care had 29% fewer palliative care days compared to those with no analgesics prescribed before referral. Non-cancer patients aged 50 to 64 years old had shorter referral-to-death duration compared to below 50 years old (IRR:0.51,95%CI:0.28-0.91).ConclusionShorter referral-to-death duration among non-cancer patients indicated possible access inequities with delayed palliative care integration. Factors influencing referral-to-death duration should be accounted for in developing targeted approaches to ensure timely and equitable access to all patients requiring palliative care.KEY MESSAGESWhat is already known on this topicAddressing the need for timely integration of palliative care in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is a priority, considering its increasing burden of non-communicable diseases with limited data available in this region.What this study addsFindings from our study have shown an underrepresentation of non-cancer patients amongst community palliative care referrals with a shorter referral-to-death duration among these patients as compared to cancer patients.Age, sex, and use of analgesia prior to referrals were factors significantly associated with referral-to-death duration among cancer patients whereas for non-cancer patients, older aged patients had a shorter referral-to-death duration..How this study might affect research, practice or policyThe underrepresentation of non-cancer referrals for palliative care indicates the need to determine reasons for the disparity in referrals between cancer and non-cancer patients in clinical practice and to evaluate feasible and effective approaches to narrow this gap in settings similar to that of ours.At a policy level, plans to develop interventions to allow timely integration of community palliative care should target specific groups of patients.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference37 articles.

1. Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes

2. World Health Organization. Palliative care, 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care [Accessed 1 May 2022].

3. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

4. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases, 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases [Accessed 1 May 2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3