Author:
Tiittanen Henri,Holm Liisa,Törönen Petri
Abstract
AbstractMotivationAutomated protein Function Prediction (AFP) is an intensively studied topic. Most of this research focuses on methods that combine multiple data sources, while fewer articles look for the most efficient ways to use a single data source. Therefore, we wanted to test how different preprocessing methods and classifiers would perform in the AFP task when we process the output from the InterProscan (IPS). Especially, we present novel preprocessing methods, less used classifiers and inclusion of species taxonomy. We also test classifier stacking for combining tested classifier results. Methods are tested with in-house data and CAFA3 competition evaluation data.ResultsWe show that including IPS localisation and taxonomy to the data improves results. Also the stacking improves the performance. Surprisingly, our best performing methods outperformed all international CAFA3 competition participants in most tests. Altogether, the results show how preprocessing and classifier combinations are beneficial in the AFP task.Contactpetri.toronen(AT)helsinki.fiSupplementary informationSupplementary text is available at the project web site http://ekhidna2.biocenter.helsinki.fi/AFP/ and at the end of this document.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory