Author:
Versace Elisabetta,Freeland Laura,Wang Shuge,Emmerson Michael G.
Abstract
AbstractIf a congenitally blind person learns to distinguish between a cube and a sphere by touch, would they immediately recognise these objects by sight if their vision is restored? This question, posed by Molyneux in 1688, has puzzled philosophers and scientists. We overcame ethical and practical difficulties in the study of cross-modal recognition by using inexperienced chicks. We hatched chicks in darkness, exposed them to tactile smooth vs. bumpy stimuli in darkness and then tested them in a visual recognition task. At first sight, chicks previously exposed to smooth stimuli approached the smooth stimulus significantly more than those exposed to the bumpy stimuli. This shows that cross-modal recognition does not require multimodal experience. At least in precocial species, supra-modal brain areas already function at birth.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference29 articles.
1. D. Marjolein , G.-J. Lokhorst , “Molyneux’s Problem.” Stanford Encycl. Philos. (2021), (available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/molyneux-problem/).
2. M. Degenaar , Molyneux’s problem: three centuries of discussion on the perception of forms (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996).
3. Adam Smith and the Problem of the External World;J. Scottish Philos,2011
4. Two Forms of Knowledge Representations in the Human Brain;Neuron,2020
5. Revisiting the molyneux question
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献