Movement data link phenotypic traits to individual fitness in a nocturnal predator
Author:
Becciu PaoloORCID, Séchaud RobinORCID, Schalcher KimORCID, Plancherel Céline, Roulin AlexandreORCID
Abstract
AbstractRecent biologging technology reveals hidden life and breeding strategies of nocturnal animals. Combining animal movement patterns with individual characteristics and landscape features can uncover meaningful behaviours that directly influence fitness. Consequently, defining the proximate mechanisms and adaptive value of the identified behaviours is of paramount importance. Breeding female barn owls (Tyto alba), a colour-polymorphic species, recurrently visit other nest boxes at night. We described and quantified this behaviour for the first time, linking it with possible drivers, and individual fitness. We GPS-equipped 178 breeding pairs of barn owls from 2016 to 2020 in western Switzerland during the chick rearing phase. We observed that 65% of breeding females tracked were (re)visiting nest boxes while still carrying out their first brood. We modelled their prospecting parameters as a function of partner-, individual- and brood-related variables, and found that female feather eumelanism predicted the emergence of prospecting behaviour (less melanic females are usually prospecting), while increasing male parental investment increased female exploratory efforts. Ultimately, females would revisit a nest more often if they had used it in the past and were more likely to lay a second clutch afterwards, consequently having higher annual fecundity than non-prospecting females. Despite these apparent immediate benefits, they did not fledge more chicks. We highlight how phenotypic traits can be related to movement patterns and individual fitness through biologging associated with long-term field monitoring.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference70 articles.
1. Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior;Animal Biotelemetry,2013 2. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet 3. R. Costa-Pereira , R. J. Moll , B. R. Jesmer , and W. Jetz , “Animal tracking moves community ecology: Opportunities and challenges,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 2022. 4. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research 5. R. Nathan , C. T. Monk , R. Arlinghaus , T. Adam , J. Alós , M. As-saf , H. Baktoft , C. E. Beardsworth , M. G. Bertram , A. I. Bi-jleveld , T. Brodin , J. L. Brooks , A. Campos-Candela , S. J. Cooke , K. Gjelland , P. R. Gupte , R. Harel , G. Hellström , F. Jeltsch , S. S. Killen , T. Klefoth , R. Langrock , R. J. Lennox , E. Lourie , J. R. Madden , Y. Orchan , I. S. Pauwels , M. Říha , M. Roeleke , U. E. Schlägel , D. Shohami , J. Signer , S. Toledo , O. Vilk , S. Westrelin , M. A. Whiteside , and I. Jarić , “Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement,” Science, vol. 375, Feb 2022.
|
|