Barriers and enablers to blood culture sampling: a systematic review and theoretical domains framework survey in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam

Author:

Suntornsut PornpanORCID,Asadinia Koe Stella,Limato RalaliciaORCID,Tamara Alice,Rotty Linda W.A.,Bramanti Rendra,Nusantara Dwi U.,Nelwan Erni J.,Khusuwan Suwimon,Suphamongkholchaikul Watthanapong,Chamnan Parinya,Piyaphanee Watcharapong,Huong Vu Thi Lan,Yen Nguyen Hai,Hong Khanh Nguyen,Thach Pham Ngoc,Quang Le Minh,Vinh Vu HaiORCID,Duc Chau Minh,Em Vo Thi Hoang Dung,Harriss ElinorORCID,Doorn H Rogier vanORCID,Hamers Raph L.ORCID,Lorencatto Fabiana,Atkins Lou,Limmathurotsakul DirekORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBlood culture (BC) sampling is recommended for all suspected sepsis patients prior to antibiotic administration. Here, we aimed to identify barriers and enablers to BC sampling in three Southeast Asian countries.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating barriers/enablers to BC sampling from 1900 to 2020 globally (PROSPERO, CRD42020206557). Using the findings of the systematic review, we developed and conducted a Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-based survey with a case scenario question among doctors and final-year medical students in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.FindingsIn the systematic review, we identified 6,175 unique records from the databases, of which 25 met the eligibility criteria. Studies were conducted in 37 high-income countries (HICs) and 41 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Of 14 TDF domains, three and seven were not assessed in HICs and LMICs by the studies included in the systematic review, respectively. 1,070 medical doctors and 238 final-year medical students completed the survey. The proportion of respondents who would definitely take BC in the case scenario was 89.8% for Thai, 50.5% for Vietnamese and 31.3% for Indonesians (p<0.001). Eight TDF domains were considered key in influencing BC sampling, including ‘no awareness of guideline [TDF-knowledge]’, ‘low priority of BC [TDF-goals]’, ‘no intention to follow guidelines [TDF-intention]’, ‘level of doctors who can order or initiate an order for BC [TDF-social professional role and identity]’, ‘no norms of BC sampling [TDF-social influence]’, ‘perceived cost-effectiveness of BC [TDF-environmental context and resources]’, ‘regulation on cost reimbursement [TDF-behavioural regulation]’ and ‘consequences that discourage BC sampling [TDF-reinforcement].’ However, there was substantial heterogeneity between the countries across most domains.ConclusionsEvidence on barriers and enablers to BC sampling is limited globally. We identified individual, socio-cultural and environmental barriers/enablers to BC sampling across different countries, which represent potential targets for interventions. Context-specific multifaceted interventions at both hospital and policy levels are required to improve diagnostic stewardship practices.FundingWellcome Trust, UK (220557/Z/20/Z).

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3