Germline variation contributes to false negatives in CRISPR-based experiments with varying burden across ancestries

Author:

Misek Sean A.,Fultineer Aaron,Kalfon Jeremie,Noorbakhsh Javad,Boyle Isabella,Dempster Joshua,Petronio Lia,Huang Katherine,Saadat Alham,Green Thomas,Brown Adam,Doench John G.,Root David,McFarland James,Beroukhim Rameen,Boehm Jesse S.

Abstract

AbstractReducing disparities is critical to promote equity of access to precision treatments for all patients with cancer. While socioenvironmental factors are a major driver behind such disparities, biological differences also are likely to contribute. The prioritization of cancer drug targets is foundational for drug discovery, yet whether ancestry-related signals in target discovery pipelines exist has not been systematically explored due to the absence of data at the appropriate scale. Here, we analyzed data from 611 genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 viability experiments in human cell line models as part of the Cancer Dependency Map to identify ancestry-associated genetic dependencies. Surprisingly, we found that most putative associations between ancestry and dependency arose from artifacts related to germline variants that are present at different frequencies across ancestry groups. In 2-5% of genes profiled in each cellular model, germline variants in sgRNA targeting sequences likely reduced cutting by the CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease. Unfortunately, this bias disproportionately affected cell models derived from individuals of recent African descent because their genomes tended to diverge more from the consensus genome typically used for CRISPR/Cas9 guide design. To help the scientific community begin to resolve this source of bias, we report three complementary methods for ancestry-agnostic CRISPR experiments. This report adds to a growing body of literature describing ways in which ancestry bias impacts cancer research in underappreciated ways.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3