Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units

Author:

Harkness Mairi,Yuill Cassandra,Cheyne Helen,McCourt Christine,Black Mairead,Pasupathy Dharmintra,Sanders Julia,Wallace Chloe,Heera-Shergill Neelam,Stock Sarah

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInduction of Labour (IOL) is an increasingly common obstetric intervention, offered to 30-50% of pregnant women in the UK. IOL affects experience of childbirth: it is more painful than spontaneous labour and more likely to lead to additional interventions including operative birth. Experience of childbirth is important to women, and negative experience of childbirth has been linked to serious psychological harm. The high and rising rate of IOL has implications for provision of safe, effective, person-centred maternity services, yet there is little information about women’s experiences of induction.AimTo explore women’s views and experiences of key elements of the IOL process, including at home or in hospital cervical ripening (CR)MethodsA questionnaire-based postnatal survey of 309 women who had IOL at UK maternity units in 2021/22, undertaken as part of the CHOICE Study process evaluation The questionnaire was administered online and included fixed response and free text options. Findings are reported as descriptive statistics with content analysis of women’s comments providing context.FindingsInformation to support choice and understand what to expect about IOL is often inadequate or unavailable. Having IOL can create anxiety and remove options for birth that women had hoped would enhance their experience. Although it can provide a more comfortable environment, home CR is not always an acceptable solution. Women described maternity care negatively impacted by staffing shortages; delays to care sometimes led to unsafe situations.Women who had a positive experience of IOL described supportive interaction with staff as a significant contribution to that.ConclusionsWomen do not experience IOL as a benign and consequence free intervention. There is urgent need for research to better target IOL and optimise safety and experience for women and their babies. Relatively few women were offered CR at home and further research is needed on this experience.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference22 articles.

1. NMPA Project Team. National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Clinical Report 2022. Based on births in NHS maternity services in England and Wales between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019. London: RCOG; 2022.

2. On behalf of the CHOICE Study Consortia. Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2021

3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence NICE. Inducing Labour. Clinical Guideline {CG207}. Published 4th November 2021. At: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng207

4. Women’s experiences of outpatient induction of labour with double balloon catheter or prostaglandin pessary: A qualitative study

5. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3